|

by Phillip Goodman
Vice-President, Thy Kingdom Come Ministries
The subject of Daniel 11:36-45 is clearly
the Antichrist. The timeframe for the events of this passage is
the end time (11:40; 12:1, 2).[1] Based primarily on data gleaned from the Daniel passage, some
have claimed that the Antichrist will be Jewish. The ethnic or
racial origins of the Antichrist cannot be determined from the data
in this passage alone. The verse most often used to show that the
Antichrist will arise from Jewish ancestry is Daniel 11:37, which
states, “neither shall he regard the God of his fathers,” which
implies that his fathers worshipped the God of Israel (KJV). However,
this verse can just as legitimately be translated to read “and he
will show no regard for the gods of his fathers,” as it reads in
the NASV and the NIV.[2] In fact, the latter translation is more favorable. It would
be a redundant statement to say that the Antichrist will have no
regard for “the God of his fathers,” since the previous verse has
already stated that he “will speak monstrous things against the
God of gods,” that is, the God of the fathers of Israel (e.g. Abraham,
Isaac, and Jacob).
The emphatic teaching of Scripture
is that the Antichrist would be a Gentile. One line of reasoning
which I believe to be particularly compelling served as the basis
for my book, The Assyrian Connection.[3]
When one reads the prophecies of Daniel concerning the final world
power, he witnesses a systematic narrowing of the prophetic focus
devoted to this infamous character. Daniel 2 records the final
Gentile power of this age emerging as the revived Roman empire,
which includes a western “leg” and an eastern “leg.” This two-fold
division of the revived Roman empire implies the a 10-nation confederacy
evidenced by the toes of the image. Chapter 7 teaches explicitly
that this end-time empire with its 10 kings will eventually sharpen
the focus to introduce an 11th king, “the Antichrist.”
Chapter 8 continues to sharpen the focus by blending the person,
career and realm of Antiochus Epiphanes (ancient Syrian king) in
the same manner as that of the Antichrist. The strength of the
message of Daniel 8 is recounted in chapter 11 with an even tighter
focus offering more details. It is in that chapter that one again
witnesses this almost imperceptible merger from the arch-type, Antiochus,
to his clone-like anti-type, the Antichrist.
It is in verse 36 that one suddenly finds the
Antichrist (vv. 36-45) standing in the place of Antiochus (vv. 21-35).
This passage does not miss a beat in the discussion of this “king
of the north.” It is as though these verses were one sweeping panorama
of the same king and kingdom. The subject actually leaps more than
two millennia from the one to the other! The upshot of this to
the present discussion is that this premier antichrist-type “Antiochus
Epiphanes” was a Gentile. Since Antiochus is by far the strongest
foreshadow of the Antichrist presented in the Bible, it makes imminent
sense that the Antichrist will also be a Gentile.
Daniel 9:27 states that the Antichrist deceives
Israel with a false peace covenant. To some this implies that he
must be Jewish. Actually, the Americans and the Russians are trying
to accomplish this covenant at this very moment. Furthermore, such
a Gentile-Jewish pact is entirely within the scope of this prophecy.
It is even probable that the imprimatur of a Gentile power will
be required to seal the seven year covenant regarding the rebuilding
of the Temple and the resumption of temple sacrifices. There really
is no hint that the Antichrist is a Jew unless one accepts the elusive
Daniel 11:36 to read, “God of his fathers,” rather than “gods of
his fathers.”
It is preferable that in light of
other prophecies whose meaning is more clear one would ask: “Will
not the end-time Gentile kingdom, which is the repository of all
previous Gentile empires, be headed up by a Gentile?” (cf. Dan.
7; Rev. 13) “Will not the world leader who presides over the final
hour of the “times of the Gentiles” be himself a Gentile?” (cf.
Lk. 21:24) It is best to understand that the beast-like Antichrist
who is seen “coming up out of the sea [of Gentile nations]” in Revelation
13:1 is a Gentile. Finally, one must note that the term “antichrist”
(antichristos) means “against Christ.” He is not “in place”
of Christ, which is the meaning of the term “psuedochristos” or
“false Christ,” for he has magnified himself above “every so-called
god or object of worship.” In Matthew 24, the Antichrist is eluded
to in verse 15, but is then followed by the appearance of many false
Christs (plural, vv. 23-26). This implies that the Antichrist will
display himself as God in the Temple, and then commission his “anointed”
messianic emissaries to certify his false peace act with Israel.
It is probable that these false Christs will be Jews. These gnostic-style
new age “Christ-conscious” types will oppose the testimony of the
144,000 Messianic Jews and seek converts to the new god of this
earth, the Gentile Antichrist.
[1] The Expositor's Bible Commentary, Vol. 7
(Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1985), p. 147.
[2] John F. Walvoord, Daniel (Chicago: Moody
Press, 1971), p. 274.
[3] Phillip Goodman, The Assyrian Connection
(Prescott Press, 1993)

|